July 2004

TOP


Surface mesh reconstruction
from unorganized point clouds


Flow-based methods


Surface Reconstruction based on a Dynamical System

References:

 

Other references here.

 


Main "idea:"

Motivation:

 

 

Use of Voronoi/Delaunay objects:

 

NB: There is an error in the above right figure: one saddle point is missing for the central Delaunay edge.

 

 


NB: the driver d corresponds to an A_1^2-2 candidate; the critical point s is necessarily an A_1^3-2 for an acute triangular configuration of three generators; s' corresponds to an A_1^3-2 for an obtuse configuration s.t. the shock sheet which flows outward of it, leads to s and the associated Voronoi edge (or A_1^3 shock curve).

 


The blue dot s is an A_1^3-2 with all flows inward. The green dots correspond to A_1^3-2's with one outward flow (sheet). Red dots are input point generators (samples) which are connected by Delaunay edges creating the outward boundary of the stable manifold of s.

NB: The green dot on the LHS of the blue s is not correct as drawn, since its associated triplet of generators form an acute triangle.

 

Flow complex:

Theorem 2:

 

Notes (re-interpretation in the language of shock graphs and scaffolds):

With this procedure, we end-up with a complex which is typically larger than the desired mesh, M*.

NB: The above is a sytematic triangulation process; there are no constraints derived from sampling conditions or from surface-related configurations (e.g., more the two stable manifolds may be attached to the same Delaunay edges).

Reduced flow-complex:

Iteratively remove parts of the flow complex which locally are non-manifold: i.e., such that the associated Gabriel (Delaunay) edge has more than 2 surface patches (3 or more stable manifolds of index 2) through it.

 

 

Remaining "problem:" resolve topological non-regularities.

NB: Nearby patches which are connected: separate these (heuristic based? unclear in the paper how this is done).

 

Extension to shape partitioning and matching in:

Relationships with alpha-shapes:

Extension to the power diagram in:

 


Summary/Comment

 

NB: I met Giesen last year at the Workshop on surface meshing at DIMACS and told him that their work was very closely related to ours. He did not know of shock graphs and scaffold at the time. In their most recent papers they do mention one of our papers (shock scaffolds, IWVF 2001), but only as a method to compute the MA, and they seem unaware of previous work on 2D shapes.

 


TOP

 

Last Updated: July 8, 2004